Email

NIH Researchers Infect Live Subjects With Influenza In Study Intended To Improve Vaccine

(Shutterstock) The U.S. National Institutes of Health is studying influenza in live volunteers quarantined for nine days, hoping to improve vaccine capability.

Forget a Klondike bar, what would you do for $3,000 in easy money? As seasonal influenza sweeps much of the country, scores of study volunteers are allowing government scientists — in a rare live study — to infect them with influenza, in hopes of soon improving vaccine capability.

(Shutterstock) The U.S. National Institutes of Health is studying influenza in live volunteers quarantined for nine days, hoping to improve vaccine capability.

Study leader Matthew Memoli, of the National Institutes for Health (NIH), told theAssociated Press in an interview, “Vaccines are working, but we could do better.” A few thousand Americans die every year of seasonal influenza, according to estimates from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The U.S. government recommends annual influenza vaccination for everyone ages 6 months and older, as the best way to prevent outbreaks of the potentially deadly respiratory disease. But science still lacks basic information about how the vaccine works, including the optimum antibody response from the immune system.

During the next year, Memoli and his colleagues will deliberately infect as many as 100 healthy volunteers, younger than age 50, who will stay for nine days in an isolated hospital ward at NIH headquarters in Bethesda, Md. Government scientists wish to study the immune system’s flu response in young adults to ascertain the immunological component missing in elderly people, who are more susceptible to influenza viruses. In use for decades, the vaccine was designed to raise antibody levels to fight the influenza infection by targeting a protein — hemagglutinin — serving as a viral bodyguard, of sorts.

Yet, medical science has yet to determine an optimum level of antibody response, or what causes some people to get sick when others stay healthy, all things being equal. “As mind-boggling as it is, we don’t know the answer to that,” Anthony Fauci, leader of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases at NIH, told the AP. “We made some assumptions that we knew everything about flu.”

Yet, the interplay between influenza and the human body may prove more complex than merely “checking the oil,” with more factors than hemagglutinin to be considered. In the study, some volunteers didn’t get sick from influenza, even with lower levels of the influenza-fighting antibody, suggesting another protective factor. Perhaps other antibodies targeting the neuraminidase protein make a difference in whether a given patient would get sick or not? Or maybe the virus affects epigenetic changes in its host, causing the expression — or suppression — of specific genes. T-cells, anyone?

 

Related posts

Blue health: How the sea benefits our physical and mental wellbeing

Why is it so difficult to make a new antibiotic?

What are the lessons from America’s great cannabis liberalisation experiment?