Email

Analysis – China scandal risks sapping will for reform

China's former Chongqing Municipality Communist Party Secretary Bo Xilai looks on during a meeting at the annual session of China's parliament, the National People's Congress, at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing in this March 6, 2010 file photo. REUTERS/Jason Lee/Files

By Don Durfee and Chris Buckley

BEIJING (Reuters) – China’s

most lurid political scandal in years could claim yet another victim – the boldness to grasp difficult reforms needed to ward

off mounting risks to growth and stability.

Beijing long ago signalled the need for deeper changes to usher in the next round of

growth as the country’s polluting, export-led model runs out of steam.

But in recent months, Premier Wen Jiabao and

others have warned that China is running out of time to tackle important reforms, including freeing up land ownership and

reining in the coddled state-owned sector.

The ouster of ambitious leadership contender Bo Xilai, who wrapped himself

in populist rhetoric, could sap China’s will to tackle nettlesome problems by discouraging bold ideas from either to the

left or the right, especially ahead of a leadership succession from later this year.

Bo was a brash politician who

loved the limelight, a rival who needled other leaders to compete in policy innovations, said analysts.

“When Bo Xilai

was still a factor, that was provoking rivalry between left and right, and encouraging more reformist impulses so that each

camp could show its stance,” said Chen Yongmiao, a lawyer and political commentator in Beijing.

Had Bo had been

promoted to the top leadership, “reformists might have had to be more forceful precisely in order to counter his influence”,

said Chen. “But now he’s been ousted, their steps could be weaker because the incentive isn’t there.”

This week, the

ruling Chinese Communist Party announced Bo, recently dismissed as the party chief of Chongqing municipality in southwest

China, had also been suspended from the Central Committee, a council of senior officials. Bo’s wife was named as a suspect

in the murder of British businessman Neil Heywood.

Until his abrupt downfall, Bo was widely seen as a contender for a

spot in the party’s next Standing Committee, an inner-circle of decision-making power that now has nine members.

Even

before the stunning announcement about Bo, President Hu Jintao had signalled caution in the face of calls to embrace big

financial and political reforms that would curtail central power, according to an editor in Beijing with close ties to senior

officials.

“Now is not the right time to consider reform in some crucial areas,” Hu said recently, according to the

editor, who spoke on condition of anonymity, citing the sensitivity of policy debates.

Hu did not specify which

reforms he meant, but the editor took it to mean that political changes, along with challenges to the grip of the powerful

state-owned businesses, were off limits.

Just last week Premier Wen called the country’s big banks a monopoly that

must be dismantled to get money flowing to cash-starved private firms.

Other changes include reforming land ownership,

which could dramatically increase the supply of housing and let out air from the property bubble, opening state-dominated

sectors like telecommunications and healthcare to real private competition, and introducing market-based interest rates for

banks.

Further delay in such reforms is an alarming prospect for economists who see trouble ahead if some of the most

important changes are put off for much longer.

An increasingly urgent chorus of policy-advisers and intellectuals

warns that without reforms, economic growth and political stability could be imperilled.

“You can wait until after the

leadership transition (in early 2013) but by then you might already have a crisis,” said Tao Ran, a professor of economics at

Renmin University in Beijing.

THE CASE FOR CHANGE

Pushing through big change in a year of leadership transition

was always going to be difficult. Breaking up state monopolies and fiscal reforms could create disruption the party wants to

avoid as it tries to engineer a smooth handover of power.

But the leadership rifts uncovered by the Bo Xilai scandal

suggest that even after the new leaders take power, it could be hard to achieve the consensus needed to confront vested

interests like state-owned enterprises and banks.

“Reform needs an ideological consensus or overriding will from a

powerful leader like Deng Xiaoping, and that doesn’t exist,” said the Beijing editor.

“The system of power prizes

stability before all else, and there’s no real reform that doesn’t affect stability, so there’s no real will to take on

deeper reforms.”

China’s past decades of stunning growth have been driven by huge overinvestment in manufacturing,

which has produced a glut in production capacity. To ensure a market for all those goods, China has held its currency low,

which in turn has brought back a flood of foreign exchange that has stoked inflation and real estate bubbles, among

others.

Along the way, a growing state sector has stifled innovation and encouraged misallocation of capital, often

funnelling it into even more industrial capacity in China’s coastal areas.

Shrinking the bubbles and spreading wealth

more evenly means spurring domestic consumption and fostering more private sector competition, both of which could boost

growth and create jobs, which are priorities for the Communist Party.

“There is still huge room for China to grow if

it deregulates land, for instance,” said Tao of Renmin University. “With 200 million migrant workers and their families,

there are maybe 150 million housing units that need to be built. That’s a huge business.”

Some reforms are edging

ahead.

Last week, Premier Wen announced plans for a pilot project in Wenzhou to encourage small lenders to help

private businesses often ignored by the state-owned banks.

And in recent years, the government has expanded the

offshore market for trading the yuan, a major step for eventual liberalisation of the currency.

But critics say such

changes are no substitute for bigger reforms that keep getting pushed back.

“These are issues you can postpone by a

few months or year or longer, and that is what has been happening for a long time,” said Louis Kuijs, a former World Bank

economist now with the Fung Global Institute in Hong Kong.

“But if the measures the government will use to rebalance

its economy don’t include hard-to-take reforms like levelling the playing field for private enterprise, then you may see

that growth comes down a lot.”

While few expect glimmers of major change before the leadership handover, there is the

chance that the departure of Bo, with his brash ways and Mao Zedong-inspired rhetoric, could actually make it easier the new

leaders to muster consensus for reform.

“It will help reform by removing this advocate of policies inspired by Mao,”

said Wu Jiaxiang, a former central government official in Beijing who writes about politics.

(Additional reporting by

Kevin Yao; Editing by Brian Rhoads and Robert Birsel)

Related posts

US election: what a Trump victory would mean for the rest of the world

US-Africa relations under Biden: a mismatch between talk and action

How Putin views the choice between Harris and Trump, and what the election means for Russia