Email

Anger as retrial of Egypt’s Mubarak aborted

Former Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak sits inside a cage in a courtroom in Cairo June 2, 2012. REUTERS/Stringer

(Reuters) – The retrial of former Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak collapsed on Saturday when the presiding judge withdrew from the case and referred it to another court, causing an indefinite adjournment that sparked anger in the courtroom.

Former Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak sits inside a cage in a courtroom in Cairo June 2, 2012. REUTERS/Stringer

“The people demand the execution of Mubarak!” relatives of demonstrators killed in the 2011 uprising that overthrew him chanted in court after presiding Judge Mustafa Hassan Abdullah announced the decision at the opening session.

Outside the heavily guarded compound, pro-Mubarak demonstrators outnumbered opponents. The two groups were kept well apart by a police cordon and there were no incidents.

Mubarak, 84, who ruled Egypt for almost 30 years before being toppled by 18 days of Arab Spring pro-democracy unrest, waved and smiled to supporters from the defendants’ cage in the courtroom before the brief hearing began.

He was flown by helicopter from a military hospital where he has been detained to the police academy used as a courthouse, and wheeled from an ambulance into the building lying on a hospital trolley wearing a white tracksuit.

Mubarak, former Interior Minister Habib al-Adli and four top aides face a retrial for complicity in the murder of more than 800 protesters after the highest appeals court accepted appeals by both the defense and the prosecution in January. Two other senior interior ministry officials face lesser charges.

But the judge, who like most of the current judiciary was appointed under Mubarak, said he had decided to refer the case to the Cairo appeals court as he felt “unease” in reviewing the case. He did not explain his decision further.

He has previously acquitted top former Mubarak era officials on charges of orchestrating violence when pro-democracy activists were attacked by thugs riding on camels in Cairo’s central Tahrir Square.

“We ask for the harshest possible sentence on Mubarak due to the cruel crimes he committed against the protesters, but we are happy with the judge’s decision to withdraw as we had worries about him given his ruling (on) the camel attack case,” said Mohamed Abdel Wahab, a lawyer for the victims.

It was the first time Mubarak, who wore gold-rimmed aviator sunglasses in court, had been seen in public since he and Adli were convicted last June on grounds of failing to stop the killing, rather than actually ordering it.

Mubarak’s two sons, Alaa and Gamal, were also in court to be retried on separate charges of financial corruption.

Propped up on a gurney in a cage with the other defendants, he looked fitter and more relaxed than on previous appearances in the dock, holding animated conversations with his son Gamal, and occasionally smiling and waving to people in the courtroom.

COMPETING DEMONSTRATIONS

Prosecutors accuse Mubarak of giving orders to Adli to open fire with live ammunition against protesters to suppress demonstrations across the Arab world’s most populous country.

Mubarak and his interior minister were sentenced to life imprisonment at their first trial but the appeals court upheld complaints stemming from the weakness of the evidence offered by the prosecution.

Outside the court, pro-Mubarak demonstrators chanted “thirty years without destruction!” in reference to accusations that the Muslim Brotherhood movement which won free elections after his ouster are destroying the country.

“The word ‘sorry’ is not enough!” the pro-Mubarak crowd chanted. Some held posters of Mubarak and signs reading “Where are your days?”

“Look at the country now,” said a supporter who gave his name as Ibrahim. “When Mubarak fell, there were $40 billion (in foreign reserves). And now after two years, we are going bankrupt. The whole country is suffering from this economic crisis, from this lack of security.”

Across the square, relatives of victims of Mubarak’s security forces held posters of young men killed in the revolt.

“What can I expect from this trial? If there was justice in this country, the first trial would have been fair,” said Eman Saeed, whose 24-year old son Mohab died in January 2011 after marching from the working-class district of Shobra to Tahrir Square. Saeed said Mohab died from bullet wounds to the chest.

Mubarak became the first ruler toppled by the Arab Spring uprisings to stand trial in person. But the case has also exposed the difficulties of transitional justice in a country where the judiciary and security forces are still largely run by men appointed during the Mubarak era.

 

Read full article on reuters.com

 

 

 

 

Related posts

Will it be Kamala Harris or Donald Trump? Here’s what each needs to win the US election

Who formally declares the winner of the US presidential election?

Nationalism is not patriotism: 3 insights from Orwell about Trump and the 2024 election