Email

Suing descendants, in real life

Actor George Clooney, winner of best actor in a motion picture drama for his role in "The Descendants", poses in the photo room at the 69th annual Golden Globe Awards in Beverly Hills, California, January 15, 2012. REUTERS/ Lucy Nicholson

(Reuters) – Real life can be a lot harsher than movies suggest, when it comes to descendants and money.

Actor George Clooney, winner of best actor in a motion picture drama for his role in “The Descendants”, poses in the photo room at the 69th annual Golden Globe Awards in Beverly Hills, California, January 15, 2012. REUTERS/ Lucy Nicholson

“The Descendants” movie, which awaits possible honors at the Academy Awards on Sunday, portrays a family conflict over inherited real estate, but has nothing on the dramatic battles that often play out between heirs in real-life courtrooms around the world.

Take the family feud behind Samsung Electronics Co. The company’s chairman was sued in South Korea by his brother, in a dispute over shares in the company that their father started. Lee Maeng-Hee, 80 is suing Lee Kun-Hee,78, seeking $623 million and accusing his younger brother of keeping the family wealth for himself.

So, family inheritance squabbles aren’t limited to the young, and they may not be triggered immediately following a wealthy parent’s demise. Lee Byung-chull, Samsung Electric’s founder and the counterparties’ father, died in 1987.

Whatever their intricacies, intra-family lawsuits may be on the rise. As Baby Boomers continue to move into their later years, a massive transfer of wealth is expected to take place. Even when the stakes aren’t so high — as when a family’s business or holdings are at stake and heirs aren’t in agreement — litigation is sure to follow.

EXTENDED BATTLES

Time doesn’t always heal all wounds.

A battle between the heirs of Hawaiian banker Samuel M. Damon, is still raging, even though Damon died in 1924. One issue was eventually settled in 1994 by the Hawaii Supreme Court.

After the demise of the last of his grandchildren, Joan Damon Haig, eight years ago, nearly $1 billion in stock and real estate was liquidated and divided among the heirs. Two of them continue to dispute how the money was handled after the liquidation, and whether they received proper disclosure.

Few family financial feuds can rival that of the Pritzkers – the family that owns the Hyatt hotel chain.

The original plan was to keep the family wealth together, but that fell apart in the years following the death of Hyatt co-founder Jay Pritzker in 1999.

In 2002, Liesel Pritzker, then 19, sued her father and 11 older cousins for $6 billion. She alleged that they had cheated her and her brother out of their trust funds in a plan that divided the family fortune (estimated then at $15 billion) and called for it to be paid out over a decade.

Although the case was settled in 2005 for a reported $450 million each to Liesel and her brother, the process of sharing the wealth among the cousins just ended in December. The 2011 Forbes list of wealthiest Americans has 11 Pritzkers listed as billionaires.

Probate and trust attorney Michael Dribin, with Harper Meyer in Miami, says he witnesses such acrimony time and again, with a common thread — poor planning and a lack of dialogue before a senior family member dies.

SIBLING ENVY

When one child is given more than others or is ceded more control — or when some are involved in the family business and some aren’t — the rifts can widen fairly quickly. Lawyers are then brought in and civility can disappear fast.

“They can quickly devolve into expensive and emotional proceedings,” Dribin says.

Knowing this, why don’t the aging parents make provisions for potential disputes?

Some do. Some think they have, and add provisions to a will that sometimes further complicate matters. Others, Dribin says, simply don’t want to deal with the drama and the idea of death.

“Some of these business owners — they’ve been very successful and they don’t want to confront their own mortality,” he says. “Some of them don’t want to confront problems,” including conflicts among their children.

Money and death magnify the normal conflicts of any family, says Allan Cutrow, chair of the Trusts and Estates group at Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp in Los Angeles.

“Every perceived slight that was visited upon one child or the other seems to be an opportunity to get involved in litigation.”

The challenge is to encourage heirs to separate the emotional issues they want to air, from the monetary issues they are in conflict over, he said.

“The more healthy and mature the relationship between the parties, the greater the likelihood they’ll work through their issues,” Cutrow said. “There’s always a little jealousy. In healthy families, everybody takes a breath and maybe there’s a compromise here or compromise there and everyone gets through it.”

Of course, that’s not always the case, and fighting among siblings, cousins and other relations can evolve into a costly war that serves only to enrich lawyers.

“They could beat their brains out in litigation,” Cutrow says. “At the end of the day they can’t possibly win. Even if they win, economically they lose because of the amount of money they spent getting there.”

Not all troubles are presented in lawsuits, and even well-intending parents can’t always avoid them.

New York financial adviser Elle Kaplan recalls clients who tried to nip in the bud potential conflicts with their children. They favored one of two siblings in their will, and included a clause promising disinheritance to anyone who brought a lawsuit over the inheritance. So, while there was no lawsuit, there was plenty of ill feeling, and a pair of brothers who no longer speak with each other.

YOU DON’T HAVE TO BE RICH

While significant amounts of wealth can prolong a battle, it isn’t a prerequisite; experts say they see siblings who aren’t rich sue each other all the time.

“There’s always rivalry among siblings,” Kaplan says. It’s important to have dialogue before death so the descendants aren’t left to sort out plans they either don’t understand or inadvertently pit one against another, she said.

When Leona Helmsley died in 2007 and left $12 million to her dog and nothing to two of her grandchildren, it was an example of how family troubles during life can foster further complications after death, Kaplan said.

The grandchildren went to court, and a judge agreed that Helmsley was not of sound mind when she made the last version of her will, and each was awarded $6 million. The dog’s share was trimmed to $2 million. (The dog, a Maltese named Trouble, died in 2010.) The bulk of Helmsley’s estate went to her charitable trust.

Let that be a lesson: A little estate planning and conversation can help a family avoid fighting like cats and dogs — or fighting with cats or dogs over an inheritance.

(Editing by Linda Stern, Bernadette Baum and Andrea Evans)

Related posts

Kenya drops airport deal with Adani Group after US indictments

International Criminal Court issues arrest warrants for Netanyahu and Hamas officials

Why Donald Trump’s election win fuelled a stock market surge