By Louis Charbonneau
UNITED NATIONS (Reuters) – The U.N. Security Council has reached a deal on a draft resolution to
renew the mandate of the peacekeeping force in the disputed territory of Western Sahara this week, envoys said, but the
Polisario Front independence movement and South Africa are disappointed.
The renewal of the mandate of the peacekeeping force, known as MINURSO, marks an annual battle in the
council between Morocco, backed by France, and African nations supporting Polisario.
The African countries have
repeatedly called for U.N. peacekeepers to be given the task of monitoring alleged human rights abuses.
Morocco and
France, its former colonial master, have resisted the idea that the peacekeepers should report on rights abuses in Western
Sahara, a sparsely populated tract of desert that has phosphates, fisheries and, potentially, oil and gas.
Former
British diplomat Carne Ross, who heads the Independent Diplomat, a group that advises Polisario, wrote in the Guardian
newspaper last week that Western Sahara is the “forgotten first source of the Arab Spring.” He was referring to the Moroccan
authorities’ deadly crackdown on protests there by the Saharawi population in late 2010.
While the Security Council
has never formally assigned the peacekeepers the role of human rights monitoring, Morocco has faced pressure to allow
language on human rights in the resolutions on Western Sahara. Rabat insists the territory should come under its sovereignty,
but the Polisario contends it is a sovereign state.
The latest draft calls on both sides to respect human rights and
welcomes Morocco’s decision to set up a national council on rights and grant access to the Geneva-based U.N. Human Rights
Council. Previous resolutions had made only a vague reference to the “human dimension” of the conflict.
The Polisario,
which represents the Saharawi people, waged a guerrilla war against Moroccan forces until the United Nations brokered a
ceasefire in 1991 with the understanding that a referendum would be held on the fate of the
territory.
The referendum was never held and attempts to reach a lasting deal have
floundered.
The new draft resolution has the council “stressing the importance of improving the human rights situation
in Western Sahara and the Tindouf camps, and encouraging the parties to … to ensure full respect for human
rights.”
U.N. BEEFED UP CRITICISM OF MOROCCO
The draft resolution, which would extend the peacekeepers’
mandate until April 2013, is scheduled to go to a vote on Tuesday, council diplomats say. Polisario and temporary council
member South Africa are disappointed with the text.
“Certainly, human rights have been once more sacrificed by the
Security Council in Western Sahara … as a result of France’s blind support to his client in the region, Morocco,” said
Polisario’s representative in New York, Ahmed Boukhari.
South Africa’s U.N. Ambassador Baso Sangqu told Reuters he
wanted tougher language on human rights and a demand that Morocco end its restrictions on, and monitoring of,
MINURSO.
A U.N. report to the 15-nation council on Western Sahara has been a focus of controversy this month. The
United Nations circulated three different drafts to the council before settling on what it said was the “final advance
copy.”
This elicited allegations from Polisario and several council delegations, above all South Africa, that the
secretariat had caved in to pressure from Rabat and Paris to soften the report’s criticism of Morocco. Sangqu said the
changes were “deplorable” and intended to “neutralize” its criticism.
An analysis of the first draft of the U.N.
report, obtained by Reuters, which was sent directly by the head of MINURSO, Hany Abdel-Aziz, to the U.N. Department of
Peacekeeping Operations shows that much of language most critical of Morocco was added by the United Nations in New
York.
That suggests allegations that the U.N. somehow tried to whitewash Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon’s report on
Western Sahara to the Security Council are unjustified.
Parts of the report added by the U.N. secretariat include
paragraphs suggesting Morocco has been spying on MINURSO and that the mission was forced to use Moroccan diplomatic license
plates on its vehicles. The report said that “raises doubts about the neutrality of the mission.”
Also added to the
original draft was a paragraph that says the U.N. force is “unable to exercise fully its peacekeeping monitoring, observation
and reporting functions, or avail of the authority to reverse the erosion” of its ability to function.
Although there
were some changes between the three versions of Ban’s report sent to the council, those revisions were minimal compared to
the criticisms of Morocco that were added after the first draft reached the peacekeeping department, which is headed by Herve
Ladsous of France.
Morocco, a temporary council member, has declined to comment on Ban’s report and the criticisms of
Rabat contained in it.